Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC upheld the validity of reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 148 of the Act by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer, holding that both JAO and FAO possess concurrent jurisdiction under the statutory scheme, including Section 151A and the 2022 e-assessment scheme. The HC reaffirmed its earlier ruling in TKS Builders as binding within its territorial jurisdiction, noting that the SC's dismissal of an SLP against a contrary Bombay HC decision, without a reasoned order, does not impliedly overrule or dilute TKS Builders. Pending appeals before the SC were held not to affect the precedential authority of TKS Builders. Consequently, all writ petitions challenging jurisdiction and reopening were dismissed, with no relief granted to the petitioners.
The HC upheld the validity of reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 148 of the Act by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer, holding that both JAO and FAO possess concurrent jurisdiction under the statutory scheme, including Section 151A and the 2022 e-assessment scheme. The HC reaffirmed its earlier ruling in TKS Builders as binding within its territorial jurisdiction, noting that the SC's dismissal of an SLP against a contrary Bombay HC decision, without a reasoned order, does not impliedly overrule or dilute TKS Builders. Pending appeals before the SC were held not to affect the precedential authority of TKS Builders. Consequently, all writ petitions challenging jurisdiction and reopening were dismissed, with no relief granted to the petitioners.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.