ESOP expenditure allowed as FMV difference; long-term capital gain issue sent back for collector rate determination; deferred income additions disallo...
Appeal allowed; impugned order quashed as regulator failed to prove nexus or manipulative scheme; sale genuine - s.12A(a)-(c), Regs 3(a)-(d),4(1),4(2)...
Appellant's ring-back tone service held OIDAR, taxable domestically for 01.07.2012-31.07.2016; liability confirmed, penalties vacated, remanded for re...
HC allowed the writ petition filed by the assessee-company, holding that the delay of about 17 months in filing the revised/rectified return of income, based on a revised tax audit report, was satisfactorily explained and attributable to circumstances beyond the assessee's control due to the COVID-19 pandemic. HC noted the assessee's past compliance history, timely filing of the original return for AY 2018-19, and the favourable recommendations of the Jurisdictional AO and Range Head for condonation under s.119(2)(b). HC held that a justice-oriented rather than pedantic approach must govern such applications. Consequently, the impugned order rejecting condonation was quashed and set aside, the delay was condoned, and any demand/recovery/adjustment arising from the intimation u/s 143(1) was directed not to be proceeded with.
HC allowed the writ petition filed by the assessee-company, holding that the delay of about 17 months in filing the revised/rectified return of income, based on a revised tax audit report, was satisfactorily explained and attributable to circumstances beyond the assessee's control due to the COVID-19 pandemic. HC noted the assessee's past compliance history, timely filing of the original return for AY 2018-19, and the favourable recommendations of the Jurisdictional AO and Range Head for condonation under s.119(2)(b). HC held that a justice-oriented rather than pedantic approach must govern such applications. Consequently, the impugned order rejecting condonation was quashed and set aside, the delay was condoned, and any demand/recovery/adjustment arising from the intimation u/s 143(1) was directed not to be proceeded with.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.