Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that commission received by the assessee, a non-resident group entity, for global sales support services rendered to its Indian affiliate is not taxable in India, as no PE or business connection in India was established and all framework agreements and services were executed outside India. Consequently, attribution of 35% of such commission to India was rejected. ITAT further held that royalty income could not be taxed as business income under s.44DA, as the provision applies only where royalty is effectively connected with a PE in India, which was absent; tax already deducted and offered under s.115A was accepted and transfer pricing adjustments deleted. Penalty u/s 271AA for alleged non-disclosure of certain international transactions was also deleted, ITAT holding that only transactions taxable in India require reporting, while other group transactions were taxable in the country of origin. All grounds of the assessee were allowed.
ITAT held that commission received by the assessee, a non-resident group entity, for global sales support services rendered to its Indian affiliate is not taxable in India, as no PE or business connection in India was established and all framework agreements and services were executed outside India. Consequently, attribution of 35% of such commission to India was rejected. ITAT further held that royalty income could not be taxed as business income under s.44DA, as the provision applies only where royalty is effectively connected with a PE in India, which was absent; tax already deducted and offered under s.115A was accepted and transfer pricing adjustments deleted. Penalty u/s 271AA for alleged non-disclosure of certain international transactions was also deleted, ITAT holding that only transactions taxable in India require reporting, while other group transactions were taxable in the country of origin. All grounds of the assessee were allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.