PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1 to 20 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that commission received by the assessee, a non-resident group entity, for global sales support services rendered to its Indian affiliate is not taxable in India, as no PE or business connection in India was established and all framework agreements and services were executed outside India. Consequently, attribution of 35% of such commission to India was rejected. ITAT further held that royalty income could not be taxed as business income under s.44DA, as the provision applies only where royalty is effectively connected with a PE in India, which was absent; tax already deducted and offered under s.115A was accepted and transfer pricing adjustments deleted. Penalty u/s 271AA for alleged non-disclosure of certain international transactions was also deleted, ITAT holding that only transactions taxable in India require reporting, while other group transactions were taxable in the country of origin. All grounds of the assessee were allowed.
ITAT held that commission received by the assessee, a non-resident group entity, for global sales support services rendered to its Indian affiliate is not taxable in India, as no PE or business connection in India was established and all framework agreements and services were executed outside India. Consequently, attribution of 35% of such commission to India was rejected. ITAT further held that royalty income could not be taxed as business income under s.44DA, as the provision applies only where royalty is effectively connected with a PE in India, which was absent; tax already deducted and offered under s.115A was accepted and transfer pricing adjustments deleted. Penalty u/s 271AA for alleged non-disclosure of certain international transactions was also deleted, ITAT holding that only transactions taxable in India require reporting, while other group transactions were taxable in the country of origin. All grounds of the assessee were allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.