Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT held that while CPC/ADIT is empowered to rectify an intimation issued u/s 143(1), any suo motu rectification u/s 154 must mandatorily comply with s.154(3) by issuing prior notice to the assessee. In the present case, CPC passed a rectification order dated 06.04.2022 without serving such notice and incorrectly recorded that the rectification was at the assessee's instance. The ITAT found this to be a jurisdictional defect rendering the rectification order invalid. Consequently, the ITAT set aside the order of the Ld. CIT(A) and directed the AO/CPC to cancel the impugned rectification order. The assessee's appeal was allowed, restoring the original intimation u/s 143(1).
The ITAT held that while CPC/ADIT is empowered to rectify an intimation issued u/s 143(1), any suo motu rectification u/s 154 must mandatorily comply with s.154(3) by issuing prior notice to the assessee. In the present case, CPC passed a rectification order dated 06.04.2022 without serving such notice and incorrectly recorded that the rectification was at the assessee's instance. The ITAT found this to be a jurisdictional defect rendering the rectification order invalid. Consequently, the ITAT set aside the order of the Ld. CIT(A) and directed the AO/CPC to cancel the impugned rectification order. The assessee's appeal was allowed, restoring the original intimation u/s 143(1).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.