Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT held that while CPC/ADIT is empowered to rectify an intimation issued u/s 143(1), any suo motu rectification u/s 154 must mandatorily comply with s.154(3) by issuing prior notice to the assessee. In the present case, CPC passed a rectification order dated 06.04.2022 without serving such notice and incorrectly recorded that the rectification was at the assessee's instance. The ITAT found this to be a jurisdictional defect rendering the rectification order invalid. Consequently, the ITAT set aside the order of the Ld. CIT(A) and directed the AO/CPC to cancel the impugned rectification order. The assessee's appeal was allowed, restoring the original intimation u/s 143(1).
The ITAT held that while CPC/ADIT is empowered to rectify an intimation issued u/s 143(1), any suo motu rectification u/s 154 must mandatorily comply with s.154(3) by issuing prior notice to the assessee. In the present case, CPC passed a rectification order dated 06.04.2022 without serving such notice and incorrectly recorded that the rectification was at the assessee's instance. The ITAT found this to be a jurisdictional defect rendering the rectification order invalid. Consequently, the ITAT set aside the order of the Ld. CIT(A) and directed the AO/CPC to cancel the impugned rectification order. The assessee's appeal was allowed, restoring the original intimation u/s 143(1).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.