Imported seaweed extract provisionally released on bond only; declaratory rejection set aside; appellate decision due within section 128-A(4-A) three ...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
9421 to 9440 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, deleting the addition made by the AO on account of alleged excess purchases based on differences between VAT returns and books of account. ITAT held that, under the applicable VAT Rules, mandatory reversal of input tax credit on goods returned necessarily causes variations between VAT records and commercial books, without implying inflation of purchases. The assessee's supplier-wise reconciliation was found credible, and no material was brought by the AO to establish bogus or unverifiable purchases. With sales figures matching in both records and the variation being less than one percent of total purchases, ITAT found the disallowance by AO and its confirmation by CIT(A) unjustified.
ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, deleting the addition made by the AO on account of alleged excess purchases based on differences between VAT returns and books of account. ITAT held that, under the applicable VAT Rules, mandatory reversal of input tax credit on goods returned necessarily causes variations between VAT records and commercial books, without implying inflation of purchases. The assessee's supplier-wise reconciliation was found credible, and no material was brought by the AO to establish bogus or unverifiable purchases. With sales figures matching in both records and the variation being less than one percent of total purchases, ITAT found the disallowance by AO and its confirmation by CIT(A) unjustified.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.