Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CESTAT held that the imported product, described in the Bills of Entry and supporting documents as "LPGbutane," is correctly classifiable as a mixture of propane and butane under heading 2711 1300, since butane predominates up to 98%. The contention of the appellant-importer that LPG cannot be imported as such and is always in the form of propane, butane, or their mixture was rejected, particularly in light of subsequent exemptions specifically extending to LPG, liquefied propane, liquefied butane, and their mixtures, evidencing distinct tariff treatment. Consequently, the benefit of Sl. No. 75(E) of Customs N/N. 21/2002 and Sl. No. 10 of Central Excise N/N. 4/2005 was denied, and the appeal was dismissed.
CESTAT held that the imported product, described in the Bills of Entry and supporting documents as "LPGbutane," is correctly classifiable as a mixture of propane and butane under heading 2711 1300, since butane predominates up to 98%. The contention of the appellant-importer that LPG cannot be imported as such and is always in the form of propane, butane, or their mixture was rejected, particularly in light of subsequent exemptions specifically extending to LPG, liquefied propane, liquefied butane, and their mixtures, evidencing distinct tariff treatment. Consequently, the benefit of Sl. No. 75(E) of Customs N/N. 21/2002 and Sl. No. 10 of Central Excise N/N. 4/2005 was denied, and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
