Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
AT upheld the provisional attachment order under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act against the appellant NBFC and associated entities operating instant micro-loan mobile applications. AT found that the business model-charging 30-40% processing fees on very short-term loans, resulting in effective interest rates exceeding 1500% per annum, coupled with abusive recovery practices and misuse of personal data-constituted unfair practices and violated RBI's regulatory framework and fair practice requirements. AT rejected the appellant's contention that core NBFC functions were lawfully outsourced, holding that key management functions had impermissibly been delegated to service providers. Considering the exploitative nature of the operations and reported borrower suicides, AT concluded that the revenue constituted proceeds of crime and dismissed the appeal, confirming the attachment.
AT upheld the provisional attachment order under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act against the appellant NBFC and associated entities operating instant micro-loan mobile applications. AT found that the business model-charging 30-40% processing fees on very short-term loans, resulting in effective interest rates exceeding 1500% per annum, coupled with abusive recovery practices and misuse of personal data-constituted unfair practices and violated RBI's regulatory framework and fair practice requirements. AT rejected the appellant's contention that core NBFC functions were lawfully outsourced, holding that key management functions had impermissibly been delegated to service providers. Considering the exploitative nature of the operations and reported borrower suicides, AT concluded that the revenue constituted proceeds of crime and dismissed the appeal, confirming the attachment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.