Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC upheld the conviction of A1 for offence under S.138 NI Act, holding that the cheque dated 01.07.2014 was validly presented, that a legally enforceable debt stood proved, and that presumptions under Ss.118 and 139 NI Act were not rebutted. The "lost cheque" defence was rejected as improbable and unsupported by proper investigation or contemporaneous action. Alleged contradictions and objections on financial capacity were held immaterial in view of admitted signature and supporting financial records. The reliance on unproved attendance registers was discarded. The sentence of two years' simple imprisonment was affirmed as proportionate. However, the compensation of Rs.20,00,000/- under S.357(3) CrPC was held excessive in relation to the cheque amount and was directed to be suitably reduced, resulting in partial allowance of the revision.
HC upheld the conviction of A1 for offence under S.138 NI Act, holding that the cheque dated 01.07.2014 was validly presented, that a legally enforceable debt stood proved, and that presumptions under Ss.118 and 139 NI Act were not rebutted. The "lost cheque" defence was rejected as improbable and unsupported by proper investigation or contemporaneous action. Alleged contradictions and objections on financial capacity were held immaterial in view of admitted signature and supporting financial records. The reliance on unproved attendance registers was discarded. The sentence of two years' simple imprisonment was affirmed as proportionate. However, the compensation of Rs.20,00,000/- under S.357(3) CrPC was held excessive in relation to the cheque amount and was directed to be suitably reduced, resulting in partial allowance of the revision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
