Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
ITAT held that lease rentals from areas within the warehousing complex are taxable as "income from house property," not "business income," as consistently accepted by the Revenue in preceding and succeeding years without any change in material facts. Accordingly, ITAT set aside the order of CIT(A) and directed AO to assess such lease income under the head "house property" and allow standard deduction u/s 24(1). On the addition relating to alleged speculation business, ITAT held that assignment of rights in flats constitutes transfer of a capital asset, not a speculative transaction u/s 43(5). Surplus arising therefrom is taxable under the head "capital gains." ITAT therefore directed AO to delete the speculative income addition, allowing the assessee's grounds.
ITAT held that lease rentals from areas within the warehousing complex are taxable as "income from house property," not "business income," as consistently accepted by the Revenue in preceding and succeeding years without any change in material facts. Accordingly, ITAT set aside the order of CIT(A) and directed AO to assess such lease income under the head "house property" and allow standard deduction u/s 24(1). On the addition relating to alleged speculation business, ITAT held that assignment of rights in flats constitutes transfer of a capital asset, not a speculative transaction u/s 43(5). Surplus arising therefrom is taxable under the head "capital gains." ITAT therefore directed AO to delete the speculative income addition, allowing the assessee's grounds.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.