Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
ITAT held that lease rentals from areas within the warehousing complex are taxable as "income from house property," not "business income," as consistently accepted by the Revenue in preceding and succeeding years without any change in material facts. Accordingly, ITAT set aside the order of CIT(A) and directed AO to assess such lease income under the head "house property" and allow standard deduction u/s 24(1). On the addition relating to alleged speculation business, ITAT held that assignment of rights in flats constitutes transfer of a capital asset, not a speculative transaction u/s 43(5). Surplus arising therefrom is taxable under the head "capital gains." ITAT therefore directed AO to delete the speculative income addition, allowing the assessee's grounds.
ITAT held that lease rentals from areas within the warehousing complex are taxable as "income from house property," not "business income," as consistently accepted by the Revenue in preceding and succeeding years without any change in material facts. Accordingly, ITAT set aside the order of CIT(A) and directed AO to assess such lease income under the head "house property" and allow standard deduction u/s 24(1). On the addition relating to alleged speculation business, ITAT held that assignment of rights in flats constitutes transfer of a capital asset, not a speculative transaction u/s 43(5). Surplus arising therefrom is taxable under the head "capital gains." ITAT therefore directed AO to delete the speculative income addition, allowing the assessee's grounds.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.