Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
ITAT held that lease rentals from areas within the warehousing complex are taxable as "income from house property," not "business income," as consistently accepted by the Revenue in preceding and succeeding years without any change in material facts. Accordingly, ITAT set aside the order of CIT(A) and directed AO to assess such lease income under the head "house property" and allow standard deduction u/s 24(1). On the addition relating to alleged speculation business, ITAT held that assignment of rights in flats constitutes transfer of a capital asset, not a speculative transaction u/s 43(5). Surplus arising therefrom is taxable under the head "capital gains." ITAT therefore directed AO to delete the speculative income addition, allowing the assessee's grounds.
ITAT held that lease rentals from areas within the warehousing complex are taxable as "income from house property," not "business income," as consistently accepted by the Revenue in preceding and succeeding years without any change in material facts. Accordingly, ITAT set aside the order of CIT(A) and directed AO to assess such lease income under the head "house property" and allow standard deduction u/s 24(1). On the addition relating to alleged speculation business, ITAT held that assignment of rights in flats constitutes transfer of a capital asset, not a speculative transaction u/s 43(5). Surplus arising therefrom is taxable under the head "capital gains." ITAT therefore directed AO to delete the speculative income addition, allowing the assessee's grounds.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
