Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2161 to 2180 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that lease rentals from areas within the warehousing complex are taxable as "income from house property," not "business income," as consistently accepted by the Revenue in preceding and succeeding years without any change in material facts. Accordingly, ITAT set aside the order of CIT(A) and directed AO to assess such lease income under the head "house property" and allow standard deduction u/s 24(1). On the addition relating to alleged speculation business, ITAT held that assignment of rights in flats constitutes transfer of a capital asset, not a speculative transaction u/s 43(5). Surplus arising therefrom is taxable under the head "capital gains." ITAT therefore directed AO to delete the speculative income addition, allowing the assessee's grounds.
ITAT held that lease rentals from areas within the warehousing complex are taxable as "income from house property," not "business income," as consistently accepted by the Revenue in preceding and succeeding years without any change in material facts. Accordingly, ITAT set aside the order of CIT(A) and directed AO to assess such lease income under the head "house property" and allow standard deduction u/s 24(1). On the addition relating to alleged speculation business, ITAT held that assignment of rights in flats constitutes transfer of a capital asset, not a speculative transaction u/s 43(5). Surplus arising therefrom is taxable under the head "capital gains." ITAT therefore directed AO to delete the speculative income addition, allowing the assessee's grounds.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
