Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
ITAT allowed the appeal filed by the assessee-trust, holding that the earlier dismissal was based on a patent mistake in applying s.12AA. ITAT observed that the assessee already held a valid registration under s.12AA at the time of filing the return for the relevant assessment year, and the amended registration regime, effective from 01.04.2021, was inapplicable to that year. Further, the assessee had subsequently obtained registration under the amended provisions on 28.03.2022, reinforcing its eligible status. ITAT held that CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal for non-furnishing of a new registration number and misapplication of amended law. Consequently, ITAT directed the AO to delete the demand raised by CPC, thereby granting full relief to the assessee.
ITAT allowed the appeal filed by the assessee-trust, holding that the earlier dismissal was based on a patent mistake in applying s.12AA. ITAT observed that the assessee already held a valid registration under s.12AA at the time of filing the return for the relevant assessment year, and the amended registration regime, effective from 01.04.2021, was inapplicable to that year. Further, the assessee had subsequently obtained registration under the amended provisions on 28.03.2022, reinforcing its eligible status. ITAT held that CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal for non-furnishing of a new registration number and misapplication of amended law. Consequently, ITAT directed the AO to delete the demand raised by CPC, thereby granting full relief to the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
