Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
ITAT held that the assessment framed u/s 153A was invalid as the alleged incriminating material, in the form of a statement recorded u/s 132(4), was obtained during search on a third party and not from the possession of the assessee. Such material, if construed as belonging or pertaining to a person other than the searched party, could only be used by invoking s.153C after proper satisfaction and transmission to the AO having jurisdiction over that other person. The mandatory procedure under s.153C was not followed, and the assessee was not afforded an opportunity to cross-examine the third-party witness. Consequently, the additions made under s.153A were held unsustainable and the assessee's appeal was allowed in full.
ITAT held that the assessment framed u/s 153A was invalid as the alleged incriminating material, in the form of a statement recorded u/s 132(4), was obtained during search on a third party and not from the possession of the assessee. Such material, if construed as belonging or pertaining to a person other than the searched party, could only be used by invoking s.153C after proper satisfaction and transmission to the AO having jurisdiction over that other person. The mandatory procedure under s.153C was not followed, and the assessee was not afforded an opportunity to cross-examine the third-party witness. Consequently, the additions made under s.153A were held unsustainable and the assessee's appeal was allowed in full.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
