Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
Section 80P deduction covers Souharda credit societies, including qualifying surplus-deposit interest, subject to member KYC verification for cash dep...
Transfer-pricing benchmarking and capital-receipt principles sustained taxpayer relief, while unsupported property-advance write-offs remained disallo...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
941 to 960 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NCLAT dismissed the company appeal filed by the minority shareholder (holding 5.98% shares) challenging the NCLT's approach to the waiver requirement under Section 244(1)(a) for initiating proceedings under Sections 241-242 of the Companies Act, 2013. The Appellate Tribunal held that the consensual direction to obtain a valuation report, and its submission on record, did not constitute grant of a statutory waiver nor obviate the need for a specific order under Section 244(1)(a). The valuation report was treated as a facilitative, equitable measure aimed at possible amicable settlement and not as a legal precondition. NCLAT held that the NCLT remains fully competent to independently decide the waiver application, and found no legal infirmity, thereby dismissing the appeal.
NCLAT dismissed the company appeal filed by the minority shareholder (holding 5.98% shares) challenging the NCLT's approach to the waiver requirement under Section 244(1)(a) for initiating proceedings under Sections 241-242 of the Companies Act, 2013. The Appellate Tribunal held that the consensual direction to obtain a valuation report, and its submission on record, did not constitute grant of a statutory waiver nor obviate the need for a specific order under Section 244(1)(a). The valuation report was treated as a facilitative, equitable measure aimed at possible amicable settlement and not as a legal precondition. NCLAT held that the NCLT remains fully competent to independently decide the waiver application, and found no legal infirmity, thereby dismissing the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.