Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
NCLAT held that the NCLT committed a manifest illegality by declining release of Flat No. 2402 in "Mantri Pinnacle", Bengaluru, to the successful resolution applicant (SRA) solely on the basis of an interim order of the SC, without first determining whether the said flat was actually covered by the ED's provisional attachment order. NCLT improperly shifted the burden to the enforcement authority by granting liberty to the SRA to approach it, instead of adjudicating the specific issue of attachment. NCLAT set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to NCLT to reconsider the application afresh, ascertain the attachment status of the property, and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law after granting due hearing to all parties.
NCLAT held that the NCLT committed a manifest illegality by declining release of Flat No. 2402 in "Mantri Pinnacle", Bengaluru, to the successful resolution applicant (SRA) solely on the basis of an interim order of the SC, without first determining whether the said flat was actually covered by the ED's provisional attachment order. NCLT improperly shifted the burden to the enforcement authority by granting liberty to the SRA to approach it, instead of adjudicating the specific issue of attachment. NCLAT set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to NCLT to reconsider the application afresh, ascertain the attachment status of the property, and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law after granting due hearing to all parties.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
