Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NCLAT held that the NCLT committed a manifest illegality by declining release of Flat No. 2402 in "Mantri Pinnacle", Bengaluru, to the successful resolution applicant (SRA) solely on the basis of an interim order of the SC, without first determining whether the said flat was actually covered by the ED's provisional attachment order. NCLT improperly shifted the burden to the enforcement authority by granting liberty to the SRA to approach it, instead of adjudicating the specific issue of attachment. NCLAT set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to NCLT to reconsider the application afresh, ascertain the attachment status of the property, and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law after granting due hearing to all parties.
NCLAT held that the NCLT committed a manifest illegality by declining release of Flat No. 2402 in "Mantri Pinnacle", Bengaluru, to the successful resolution applicant (SRA) solely on the basis of an interim order of the SC, without first determining whether the said flat was actually covered by the ED's provisional attachment order. NCLT improperly shifted the burden to the enforcement authority by granting liberty to the SRA to approach it, instead of adjudicating the specific issue of attachment. NCLAT set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to NCLT to reconsider the application afresh, ascertain the attachment status of the property, and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law after granting due hearing to all parties.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
