NCLAT upheld the NCLT's refusal to admit a fresh Section 7 application filed by a financial creditor (a banking institution) against the corporate debtor, noting that CIRP had already commenced and was ongoing pursuant to earlier orders, including project-wise CIRP directions for the real estate entity. The Appellate Tribunal found no legal infirmity or jurisdictional error warranting interference with the impugned order. However, it clarified that the applicant may pursue reliefs sought in the pending interlocutory application. NCLAT further recorded that, consistent with the amended CIRP Regulations, the Resolution Professional is at liberty to continue project-wise resolution for the unfinished project in which the applicant claims financial creditor status, including issuance of Information Memorandum and Form G.
NCLAT upheld the NCLT's refusal to admit a fresh Section 7 application filed by a financial creditor (a banking institution) against the corporate debtor, noting that CIRP had already commenced and was ongoing pursuant to earlier orders, including project-wise CIRP directions for the real estate entity. The Appellate Tribunal found no legal infirmity or jurisdictional error warranting interference with the impugned order. However, it clarified that the applicant may pursue reliefs sought in the pending interlocutory application. NCLAT further recorded that, consistent with the amended CIRP Regulations, the Resolution Professional is at liberty to continue project-wise resolution for the unfinished project in which the applicant claims financial creditor status, including issuance of Information Memorandum and Form G.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
