Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
HC considered the challenge to a rectification order adversely affecting the taxpayer without adequate adherence to principles of natural justice. HC set aside the impugned rectification and assessment orders and remitted the matter to the respondent authority for fresh adjudication. This remand is conditional upon the Petitioner depositing 50% of the disputed tax, as confirmed in the rectification order dated 11.09.2024, in cash from the Electronic Cash Register within 30 days of receipt of the order. The Petitioner shall, within the same period, file a detailed reply with supporting documents to the GST DRC-01 show cause notice dated 02.05.2024, treating the assessment order dated 08.07.2024 as an addendum. Petition disposed of.
HC considered the challenge to a rectification order adversely affecting the taxpayer without adequate adherence to principles of natural justice. HC set aside the impugned rectification and assessment orders and remitted the matter to the respondent authority for fresh adjudication. This remand is conditional upon the Petitioner depositing 50% of the disputed tax, as confirmed in the rectification order dated 11.09.2024, in cash from the Electronic Cash Register within 30 days of receipt of the order. The Petitioner shall, within the same period, file a detailed reply with supporting documents to the GST DRC-01 show cause notice dated 02.05.2024, treating the assessment order dated 08.07.2024 as an addendum. Petition disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4780
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
