Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
HC, exercising supervisory jurisdiction under Art. 227, held that the Tribunal exceeded its remit by interdicting general transfers in the GST Department and effectively compelling implementation of the Government's online general transfer policy within a fixed time-frame. HC observed that while the policy objective is laudable, neither the Tribunal nor the Court can mandate its implementation within a particular deadline or paralyse routine administrative transfers pending such implementation. The Revenue's undertaking that the online transfer guidelines and supporting software will be fully implemented within six months was recorded. In view of this undertaking, the impugned interdiction by the Tribunal was set aside to the extent it obstructed general transfers, and the Department was permitted to proceed with transfers in accordance with existing norms. The original petition was accordingly disposed of without further directions.
HC, exercising supervisory jurisdiction under Art. 227, held that the Tribunal exceeded its remit by interdicting general transfers in the GST Department and effectively compelling implementation of the Government's online general transfer policy within a fixed time-frame. HC observed that while the policy objective is laudable, neither the Tribunal nor the Court can mandate its implementation within a particular deadline or paralyse routine administrative transfers pending such implementation. The Revenue's undertaking that the online transfer guidelines and supporting software will be fully implemented within six months was recorded. In view of this undertaking, the impugned interdiction by the Tribunal was set aside to the extent it obstructed general transfers, and the Department was permitted to proceed with transfers in accordance with existing norms. The original petition was accordingly disposed of without further directions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.