Imported seaweed extract provisionally released on bond only; declaratory rejection set aside; appellate decision due within section 128-A(4-A) three ...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
9421 to 9440 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC held that its earlier order setting aside assessments on the amalgamating, non-existent company did not contain any "finding" or "direction" within the meaning of s.153(6) of the Act. The prior order merely applied the ratio of Maruti Suzuki to quash assessments on a non-existent entity and clarified that fresh proceedings, if any, could be initiated against the amalgamated transferee in accordance with law, which did not amount to a binding direction. Consequently, the extended limitation under s.153(6) was inapplicable. The impugned assessment framed against the transferee company for A.Y. 2007-08 was therefore held to be time-barred under s.153(1), and stood quashed, with the Revenue's contentions rejected.
HC held that its earlier order setting aside assessments on the amalgamating, non-existent company did not contain any "finding" or "direction" within the meaning of s.153(6) of the Act. The prior order merely applied the ratio of Maruti Suzuki to quash assessments on a non-existent entity and clarified that fresh proceedings, if any, could be initiated against the amalgamated transferee in accordance with law, which did not amount to a binding direction. Consequently, the extended limitation under s.153(6) was inapplicable. The impugned assessment framed against the transferee company for A.Y. 2007-08 was therefore held to be time-barred under s.153(1), and stood quashed, with the Revenue's contentions rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
