Toy balloon tariff classification: functional heading prevails over residual rubber and festive article headings, supporting penalties for deliberate ...
Customs valuation using comparable contemporaneous imports can displace declared value, while missing speaking orders require pursuit before competent...
Foreign customs declarations and importer admissions established undervaluation, supporting sequential value redetermination, differential duty, and m...
Customs seizure safeguards prevent detention-based limitation avoidance and invalidate provisional release conditions for imported vehicles under an i...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
361 to 380 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC dismissed Revenue's appeal, upholding the CIT(A) and ITAT orders allowing assessee's deduction under s.10A for its STP unit. HC held that the undertaking was not formed by "splitting up or reconstruction of a business already in existence" within the meaning of s.10A(2)(ii). The appellate authorities had recorded fact-based findings that the new unit involved substantial fresh investment and independent undertaking, despite being engaged in similar activity, and had correctly applied the governing legal principles. HC found no perversity in these factual findings and concluded that no substantial question of law arose for consideration. Consequently, the assessee's s.10A claim stood affirmed and the Revenue's appeal was rejected.
HC dismissed Revenue's appeal, upholding the CIT(A) and ITAT orders allowing assessee's deduction under s.10A for its STP unit. HC held that the undertaking was not formed by "splitting up or reconstruction of a business already in existence" within the meaning of s.10A(2)(ii). The appellate authorities had recorded fact-based findings that the new unit involved substantial fresh investment and independent undertaking, despite being engaged in similar activity, and had correctly applied the governing legal principles. HC found no perversity in these factual findings and concluded that no substantial question of law arose for consideration. Consequently, the assessee's s.10A claim stood affirmed and the Revenue's appeal was rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
