Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, holding that the assessee, an employee of a PSU/nationalized bank, is entitled to exemption on leave encashment under s. 10(10AA) of the IT Act as claimed in the return for AY 2020-21. Relying on a coordinate bench decision on identical facts, ITAT rejected the Revenue's contention that such employees cannot be treated at par with government employees for purposes of leave encashment exemption. ITAT also noted that the statutory exemption limit had remained unchanged since 2002 despite substantial upward revision in pay scales and that CBDT has recently enhanced the monetary ceiling to Rs. 25,00,000. Consequently, the leave encashment amount stands exempt and the assessment is to be modified accordingly.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, holding that the assessee, an employee of a PSU/nationalized bank, is entitled to exemption on leave encashment under s. 10(10AA) of the IT Act as claimed in the return for AY 2020-21. Relying on a coordinate bench decision on identical facts, ITAT rejected the Revenue's contention that such employees cannot be treated at par with government employees for purposes of leave encashment exemption. ITAT also noted that the statutory exemption limit had remained unchanged since 2002 despite substantial upward revision in pay scales and that CBDT has recently enhanced the monetary ceiling to Rs. 25,00,000. Consequently, the leave encashment amount stands exempt and the assessment is to be modified accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.