Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that the assessee failed to substantiate, with independent evidence, the claim of prior occupation of the old premises to justify the concessional allotment of the redeveloped flat and thereby escape addition under s.56(2)(x). While observing that recital alone is insufficient and the burden of proof rests on the assessee, ITAT considered it appropriate, in the interest of substantial justice, to grant one final opportunity to produce corroborative material before the AO. ITAT therefore set aside the order of the CIT(A) and remanded the matter to the AO for de novo adjudication. ITAT also directed that, if the claim of old occupation is not proved, the AO may examine possible cash consideration and invoke ss.69A and 115BBE, if warranted. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.
ITAT held that the assessee failed to substantiate, with independent evidence, the claim of prior occupation of the old premises to justify the concessional allotment of the redeveloped flat and thereby escape addition under s.56(2)(x). While observing that recital alone is insufficient and the burden of proof rests on the assessee, ITAT considered it appropriate, in the interest of substantial justice, to grant one final opportunity to produce corroborative material before the AO. ITAT therefore set aside the order of the CIT(A) and remanded the matter to the AO for de novo adjudication. ITAT also directed that, if the claim of old occupation is not proved, the AO may examine possible cash consideration and invoke ss.69A and 115BBE, if warranted. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.