Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, holding that the addition made by the AO under s. 56(2)(viib) in respect of share premium received from its holding company was unsustainable. ITAT noted that the deeming fiction under s. 56(2)(viib) does not apply where shares are issued to a holding company and, therefore, the AO lacked jurisdiction to invoke this provision. ITAT further held that once the assessee furnished a valuation report in accordance with Rule 11UA, the AO had no authority to modify or disregard the prescribed valuation methodology, particularly by incorrectly adopting the value of agricultural land from the balance sheet. Consequently, the share valuation adopted by the assessee was upheld and the AO was directed to delete the entire addition on account of share premium, resulting in full relief to the assessee.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, holding that the addition made by the AO under s. 56(2)(viib) in respect of share premium received from its holding company was unsustainable. ITAT noted that the deeming fiction under s. 56(2)(viib) does not apply where shares are issued to a holding company and, therefore, the AO lacked jurisdiction to invoke this provision. ITAT further held that once the assessee furnished a valuation report in accordance with Rule 11UA, the AO had no authority to modify or disregard the prescribed valuation methodology, particularly by incorrectly adopting the value of agricultural land from the balance sheet. Consequently, the share valuation adopted by the assessee was upheld and the AO was directed to delete the entire addition on account of share premium, resulting in full relief to the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.