Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT held that, under Regulation 7 read with Form B of the CIRP Regulations and in light of the SC's recognition of contractual/equitable set-off, an operational creditor may claim set-off of mutual dues while filing its claim in CIRP. In the present case, undisputed mutual liabilities existed between the Appellant and the CD under their agreements. The RP erred in refusing to allow set-off and in not restricting the Appellant's admitted claim to the net amount after adjusting Rs. 5,56,59,526 payable by the Appellant. NCLAT held that the Appellant's claim should stand at Rs. 3,40,46,082 on a net basis, but clarified that this adjustment does not affect the approved resolution plan, its implementation, or payouts to any stakeholder. The approval of the resolution plan is maintained and the appeal is disposed of with the above modification.
NCLAT held that, under Regulation 7 read with Form B of the CIRP Regulations and in light of the SC's recognition of contractual/equitable set-off, an operational creditor may claim set-off of mutual dues while filing its claim in CIRP. In the present case, undisputed mutual liabilities existed between the Appellant and the CD under their agreements. The RP erred in refusing to allow set-off and in not restricting the Appellant's admitted claim to the net amount after adjusting Rs. 5,56,59,526 payable by the Appellant. NCLAT held that the Appellant's claim should stand at Rs. 3,40,46,082 on a net basis, but clarified that this adjustment does not affect the approved resolution plan, its implementation, or payouts to any stakeholder. The approval of the resolution plan is maintained and the appeal is disposed of with the above modification.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
