Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC allowed the writ petition, holding that the importer (P) never received the consignment under the relevant Bill of Entry and was not responsible for its loss. Relying on the Short Landing Certificate and joint survey reports, HC held that the goods were lost/unavailable prior to clearance for home consumption and that the case squarely attracted Section 23 of the Customs Act, 1962. Customs duty collected in anticipation of clearance, without delivery of goods or grant of clearance by the proper officer, could not be retained and assumed the character of a refundable deposit. HC directed R1, the Assistant Commissioner of Customs (Refund), to refund Rs. 35,37,358/- with 9% interest from the date of payment within four weeks. Petition allowed.
HC allowed the writ petition, holding that the importer (P) never received the consignment under the relevant Bill of Entry and was not responsible for its loss. Relying on the Short Landing Certificate and joint survey reports, HC held that the goods were lost/unavailable prior to clearance for home consumption and that the case squarely attracted Section 23 of the Customs Act, 1962. Customs duty collected in anticipation of clearance, without delivery of goods or grant of clearance by the proper officer, could not be retained and assumed the character of a refundable deposit. HC directed R1, the Assistant Commissioner of Customs (Refund), to refund Rs. 35,37,358/- with 9% interest from the date of payment within four weeks. Petition allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
