Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT held that the amount disbursed by the Appellant NBFC to the Respondent corporate entity constituted a "financial debt" under S.5(8) IBC, as it was a commercial borrowing for time value of money, and any breach of RBI guidelines did not negate its character as financial debt. Relying on the real nature of the transaction, as evidenced by bank statements, post-dated cheques and correspondence acknowledging liability and interest, NCLAT found the debt remained unpaid. The order of the Adjudicating Authority dated 31.03.2022 rejecting the S.7 application was set aside, and the S.7 petition revived. In the interest of justice, the Corporate Debtor was granted three months to discharge the outstanding debt with 8% interest and file proof before the Adjudicating Authority.
NCLAT held that the amount disbursed by the Appellant NBFC to the Respondent corporate entity constituted a "financial debt" under S.5(8) IBC, as it was a commercial borrowing for time value of money, and any breach of RBI guidelines did not negate its character as financial debt. Relying on the real nature of the transaction, as evidenced by bank statements, post-dated cheques and correspondence acknowledging liability and interest, NCLAT found the debt remained unpaid. The order of the Adjudicating Authority dated 31.03.2022 rejecting the S.7 application was set aside, and the S.7 petition revived. In the interest of justice, the Corporate Debtor was granted three months to discharge the outstanding debt with 8% interest and file proof before the Adjudicating Authority.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.