Toy balloon tariff classification: functional heading prevails over residual rubber and festive article headings, supporting penalties for deliberate ...
Customs valuation using comparable contemporaneous imports can displace declared value, while missing speaking orders require pursuit before competent...
Foreign customs declarations and importer admissions established undervaluation, supporting sequential value redetermination, differential duty, and m...
Customs seizure safeguards prevent detention-based limitation avoidance and invalidate provisional release conditions for imported vehicles under an i...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
361 to 380 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
SC held that an unregistered deed assigning a decree for specific performance of an agreement to sell immovable property is valid and does not attract mandatory registration under S.17(1)(e) of the Registration Act, 1908. The Court reiterated that neither an agreement of sale nor a decree for specific performance, by itself, creates or transfers right, title or interest in immovable property; such rights arise only upon execution and registration of a conveyance deed. As the underlying decree does not itself create proprietary rights, its assignment does not fall within the ambit of S.17(1)(e). Consequently, the assignment deed executed by X in favour of Y was held enforceable. The Executing Ct's refusal to execute was set aside, the HC's judgment was affirmed, and the appeal was dismissed.
SC held that an unregistered deed assigning a decree for specific performance of an agreement to sell immovable property is valid and does not attract mandatory registration under S.17(1)(e) of the Registration Act, 1908. The Court reiterated that neither an agreement of sale nor a decree for specific performance, by itself, creates or transfers right, title or interest in immovable property; such rights arise only upon execution and registration of a conveyance deed. As the underlying decree does not itself create proprietary rights, its assignment does not fall within the ambit of S.17(1)(e). Consequently, the assignment deed executed by X in favour of Y was held enforceable. The Executing Ct's refusal to execute was set aside, the HC's judgment was affirmed, and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.