Tax appeal allowed: AO exceeded s.144C DRP mandate by introducing new findings and recharacterising non-resident receipts as permanent establishment i...
Anonymized petitioner gets partial relief: bank guarantee quashed, PVC-coated fabric released under reduced conditions while valuation proceedings con...
HC, in an appeal under S. 378 CrPC, set aside the judgment of acquittal in a cheque dishonour prosecution under Ss. 138 and 141 NI Act. HC held that the appellate court's view was perverse and based on misapplication of S. 141, as it ignored the admitted fact that the accused was the signatory of the dishonoured cheque. HC ruled that for a signatory, liability arises under S. 141(2) NI Act merely by virtue of signing the cheque; no further averment that he was in charge of and responsible for the conduct of the firm's business is required. The well-reasoned conviction by the Trial Court was restored, and the appeal by the complainant was allowed.
HC, in an appeal under S. 378 CrPC, set aside the judgment of acquittal in a cheque dishonour prosecution under Ss. 138 and 141 NI Act. HC held that the appellate court's view was perverse and based on misapplication of S. 141, as it ignored the admitted fact that the accused was the signatory of the dishonoured cheque. HC ruled that for a signatory, liability arises under S. 141(2) NI Act merely by virtue of signing the cheque; no further averment that he was in charge of and responsible for the conduct of the firm's business is required. The well-reasoned conviction by the Trial Court was restored, and the appeal by the complainant was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
