Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
ITAT allowed the appeal and set aside the rejection of exemption under s.10(23C)(vi) in favour of the assessee Society. The Tribunal held that generation of recurring surplus per se does not establish disqualification or profit motive where the Society's objects are educational and surpluses are applied for educational purposes; transfer to a School Development Fund and acquisition of land in the Society's name are not conclusive indicia of non-application. The matter is remitted to the CIT(A) to examine whether the funds and assets have been applied exclusively for the Society's objects and to determine eligibility for registration under s.10(23C)(vi) accordingly.
ITAT allowed the appeal and set aside the rejection of exemption under s.10(23C)(vi) in favour of the assessee Society. The Tribunal held that generation of recurring surplus per se does not establish disqualification or profit motive where the Society's objects are educational and surpluses are applied for educational purposes; transfer to a School Development Fund and acquisition of land in the Society's name are not conclusive indicia of non-application. The matter is remitted to the CIT(A) to examine whether the funds and assets have been applied exclusively for the Society's objects and to determine eligibility for registration under s.10(23C)(vi) accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.