Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3041 to 3060 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the appeal and set aside the rejection of exemption under s.10(23C)(vi) in favour of the assessee Society. The Tribunal held that generation of recurring surplus per se does not establish disqualification or profit motive where the Society's objects are educational and surpluses are applied for educational purposes; transfer to a School Development Fund and acquisition of land in the Society's name are not conclusive indicia of non-application. The matter is remitted to the CIT(A) to examine whether the funds and assets have been applied exclusively for the Society's objects and to determine eligibility for registration under s.10(23C)(vi) accordingly.
ITAT allowed the appeal and set aside the rejection of exemption under s.10(23C)(vi) in favour of the assessee Society. The Tribunal held that generation of recurring surplus per se does not establish disqualification or profit motive where the Society's objects are educational and surpluses are applied for educational purposes; transfer to a School Development Fund and acquisition of land in the Society's name are not conclusive indicia of non-application. The matter is remitted to the CIT(A) to examine whether the funds and assets have been applied exclusively for the Society's objects and to determine eligibility for registration under s.10(23C)(vi) accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
