Exempt-income expenditure disallowance is confined to investments that actually generated exempt income, while supported business expenses remain dedu...
Objective characteristics and principal use govern mining-tyre classification, while fresh advance ruling applications may rely on additional technica...
Administrative fraud classification suspension does not halt independent criminal investigation or warrant-based searches into alleged economic offenc...
ITAT allowed the appeal and directed grant of TDS credit to the assessee despite absence of Form 16 and non-reflection in Form 26AS. The Tribunal found the deductor/employer had deducted tax but failed to remit it, file returns or issue Form 16, thereby breaching Chapter XVII obligations; however, the assessee produced contemporaneous payslips evidencing deduction and could not procure employer records as an ex-employee. The Tribunal held that the revenue cannot deny credit where the assessee has furnished available documentary evidence showing deduction and where noncompliance lies with the deductor; therefore the TDS claimed in the return must be accepted and the appeal allowed.
ITAT allowed the appeal and directed grant of TDS credit to the assessee despite absence of Form 16 and non-reflection in Form 26AS. The Tribunal found the deductor/employer had deducted tax but failed to remit it, file returns or issue Form 16, thereby breaching Chapter XVII obligations; however, the assessee produced contemporaneous payslips evidencing deduction and could not procure employer records as an ex-employee. The Tribunal held that the revenue cannot deny credit where the assessee has furnished available documentary evidence showing deduction and where noncompliance lies with the deductor; therefore the TDS claimed in the return must be accepted and the appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.