Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
Section 80P deduction covers Souharda credit societies, including qualifying surplus-deposit interest, subject to member KYC verification for cash dep...
Transfer-pricing benchmarking and capital-receipt principles sustained taxpayer relief, while unsupported property-advance write-offs remained disallo...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
941 to 960 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT upheld that the TPO's substitution of projected figures...
Tax authority's substitution of projected figures with actuals overturned; original acquisition valuation upheld; transfer pricing issues remitted for ALP determination
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
ITAT upheld that the TPO's substitution of projected figures with actuals in valuation of specified assets was unwarranted; the original acquisition valuation, supported by board resolution and independent valuer, must stand and the TPO cannot rework projections against actual performance. TP adjustments regarding support services, R&D services comparables, and selection of the most appropriate method were remitted to AO/TPO for de novo determination of ALP, benchmarking and FAR-based comparable selection; AO/TPO to apply MAM/TNMM/RPM as appropriate, give the assessee opportunity of hearing, and consider submission of AE cost data, allocation keys and working capital adjustments. The remitted grounds are allowed for statistical purposes.
ITAT upheld that the TPO's substitution of projected figures with actuals in valuation of specified assets was unwarranted; the original acquisition valuation, supported by board resolution and independent valuer, must stand and the TPO cannot rework projections against actual performance. TP adjustments regarding support services, R&D services comparables, and selection of the most appropriate method were remitted to AO/TPO for de novo determination of ALP, benchmarking and FAR-based comparable selection; AO/TPO to apply MAM/TNMM/RPM as appropriate, give the assessee opportunity of hearing, and consider submission of AE cost data, allocation keys and working capital adjustments. The remitted grounds are allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.