Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
ITAT upheld that the TPO's substitution of projected figures...
Tax authority's substitution of projected figures with actuals overturned; original acquisition valuation upheld; transfer pricing issues remitted for ALP determination
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
ITAT upheld that the TPO's substitution of projected figures with actuals in valuation of specified assets was unwarranted; the original acquisition valuation, supported by board resolution and independent valuer, must stand and the TPO cannot rework projections against actual performance. TP adjustments regarding support services, R&D services comparables, and selection of the most appropriate method were remitted to AO/TPO for de novo determination of ALP, benchmarking and FAR-based comparable selection; AO/TPO to apply MAM/TNMM/RPM as appropriate, give the assessee opportunity of hearing, and consider submission of AE cost data, allocation keys and working capital adjustments. The remitted grounds are allowed for statistical purposes.
ITAT upheld that the TPO's substitution of projected figures with actuals in valuation of specified assets was unwarranted; the original acquisition valuation, supported by board resolution and independent valuer, must stand and the TPO cannot rework projections against actual performance. TP adjustments regarding support services, R&D services comparables, and selection of the most appropriate method were remitted to AO/TPO for de novo determination of ALP, benchmarking and FAR-based comparable selection; AO/TPO to apply MAM/TNMM/RPM as appropriate, give the assessee opportunity of hearing, and consider submission of AE cost data, allocation keys and working capital adjustments. The remitted grounds are allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
