Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
HC dismissed the writ insofar as it sought quashing of the impugned demand without compliance with limitation; noting the period for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the GST enactments had expired, the Court remitted the matter to the Respondent for fresh adjudication. The remand is conditional: the Assessee must deposit 50% of the disputed tax, quantified at 1,92,32,187, in cash from its Electronic Cash Ledger within 30 days of receipt of this order. On such deposit, the Respondent shall pass a fresh order after considering payments already made; otherwise the remand terms may be altered. The writ petition is disposed.
HC dismissed the writ insofar as it sought quashing of the impugned demand without compliance with limitation; noting the period for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the GST enactments had expired, the Court remitted the matter to the Respondent for fresh adjudication. The remand is conditional: the Assessee must deposit 50% of the disputed tax, quantified at 1,92,32,187, in cash from its Electronic Cash Ledger within 30 days of receipt of this order. On such deposit, the Respondent shall pass a fresh order after considering payments already made; otherwise the remand terms may be altered. The writ petition is disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
