Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2161 to 2180 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC dismissed the writ insofar as it sought quashing of the impugned demand without compliance with limitation; noting the period for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the GST enactments had expired, the Court remitted the matter to the Respondent for fresh adjudication. The remand is conditional: the Assessee must deposit 50% of the disputed tax, quantified at 1,92,32,187, in cash from its Electronic Cash Ledger within 30 days of receipt of this order. On such deposit, the Respondent shall pass a fresh order after considering payments already made; otherwise the remand terms may be altered. The writ petition is disposed.
HC dismissed the writ insofar as it sought quashing of the impugned demand without compliance with limitation; noting the period for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the GST enactments had expired, the Court remitted the matter to the Respondent for fresh adjudication. The remand is conditional: the Assessee must deposit 50% of the disputed tax, quantified at 1,92,32,187, in cash from its Electronic Cash Ledger within 30 days of receipt of this order. On such deposit, the Respondent shall pass a fresh order after considering payments already made; otherwise the remand terms may be altered. The writ petition is disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
