Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
The ITAT allowed the appellant's appeal, holding that the consideration received on sale of shares constituted capital gains rather than business income; s.28(va) did not apply because no distinct non-compete consideration was allocated and the vendor was not engaged in the target company's business. The Tribunal relied on family-transaction parity and precedent treating similar transfers as capital gains. The AO was directed to compute long-term capital gain on the aggregate sale consideration of Rs. 18.42 crore (12389 shares × Rs.14,869), to verify entitlement to deductions under ss.54F and 54EC and any set-off of capital losses, and to grant relief in accordance with law. Appeal allowed.
The ITAT allowed the appellant's appeal, holding that the consideration received on sale of shares constituted capital gains rather than business income; s.28(va) did not apply because no distinct non-compete consideration was allocated and the vendor was not engaged in the target company's business. The Tribunal relied on family-transaction parity and precedent treating similar transfers as capital gains. The AO was directed to compute long-term capital gain on the aggregate sale consideration of Rs. 18.42 crore (12389 shares × Rs.14,869), to verify entitlement to deductions under ss.54F and 54EC and any set-off of capital losses, and to grant relief in accordance with law. Appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
