Composite GST notices, mandatory limitation, and same-subject bar: HC upheld valid notices but quashed overlapping proceedings and unauthorised withho...
Page of 4821
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3581 to 3600 of 96407 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT set aside the impugned transfer-pricing adjustments and remitted issues to the AO/TPO for fresh determination. With respect to the ITES segment, the Tribunal directed a detailed FAR analysis of transactions with non-UK AEs to assess comparability with UK transactions resolved under the MAP; if comparable, the 18% operating-cost margin agreed by the Competent Authorities shall be applied. The manufacturing-segment comparables were also remitted for a fresh FAR and comparability analysis, with specific instruction to apply related-party, import/export and turnover filters under Rules 10B(2)-10B(3). The addition relating to management charges was dismissed as withdrawn. The assessee to be afforded opportunity of hearing and to furnish documentation.
The ITAT set aside the impugned transfer-pricing adjustments and remitted issues to the AO/TPO for fresh determination. With respect to the ITES segment, the Tribunal directed a detailed FAR analysis of transactions with non-UK AEs to assess comparability with UK transactions resolved under the MAP; if comparable, the 18% operating-cost margin agreed by the Competent Authorities shall be applied. The manufacturing-segment comparables were also remitted for a fresh FAR and comparability analysis, with specific instruction to apply related-party, import/export and turnover filters under Rules 10B(2)-10B(3). The addition relating to management charges was dismissed as withdrawn. The assessee to be afforded opportunity of hearing and to furnish documentation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.