Specialized Investment Fund distribution now requires dedicated certification, while transitional recognition preserves existing qualified distributor...
Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
921 to 940 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT upheld the PCIT's revision under s.263, holding the assessment to be erroneous and prejudicial to revenue for permitting a one-time deduction of accumulated foreign exchange loss on ECB repayment. Applying AS-11/ICDS-VI principles, the Tribunal confirmed that exchange differences must be recognized at each balance-sheet date and only the current-year fluctuation (Rs. 2,34,703.29 as found by PCIT) is allowable; the assessee's claimed deduction of Rs. 28,72,92,351/- was disallowed. The matter was set aside to the AO for fresh determination in accordance with PCIT's directions, affording the assessee an opportunity to be heard.
ITAT upheld the PCIT's revision under s.263, holding the assessment to be erroneous and prejudicial to revenue for permitting a one-time deduction of accumulated foreign exchange loss on ECB repayment. Applying AS-11/ICDS-VI principles, the Tribunal confirmed that exchange differences must be recognized at each balance-sheet date and only the current-year fluctuation (Rs. 2,34,703.29 as found by PCIT) is allowable; the assessee's claimed deduction of Rs. 28,72,92,351/- was disallowed. The matter was set aside to the AO for fresh determination in accordance with PCIT's directions, affording the assessee an opportunity to be heard.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.