Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2161 to 2180 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Appellant's classification of imported multimedia speakers under CTH 8518 was affirmed and the impugned reclassification to CTH 85279100 set aside; the CESTAT held that multimedia speakers with ancillary USB/SD/MMC playback and/or FM radio features fall within Chapter Heading 8518, consistent with prior tribunal and high court authorities, and that MRP-based valuation is inapplicable to such classification. Consequently, the assessment order ordering reclassification was held unsustainable, the assessment set aside, and the appeal allowed, resulting in confirmation of the Appellant's original tariff treatment and corresponding relief from the contested levy.
The Appellant's classification of imported multimedia speakers under CTH 8518 was affirmed and the impugned reclassification to CTH 85279100 set aside; the CESTAT held that multimedia speakers with ancillary USB/SD/MMC playback and/or FM radio features fall within Chapter Heading 8518, consistent with prior tribunal and high court authorities, and that MRP-based valuation is inapplicable to such classification. Consequently, the assessment order ordering reclassification was held unsustainable, the assessment set aside, and the appeal allowed, resulting in confirmation of the Appellant's original tariff treatment and corresponding relief from the contested levy.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
