Charitable trust income application permits verified capital expenditure but rejects deferred pre-operative claims and requires reconsideration of con...
Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
861 to 880 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC refused bail to the petitioner, upholding the validity of the arrest under the PMLA. The court found the arresting officer had recorded grounds of arrest and reasons to believe based on material collected, and judicial review could not probe sufficiency of that subjective satisfaction. Although compliance with s.19(2) was delayed, immediate delivery of the grounds to the petitioner enabled the court to verify that material pre-existed the arrest, distinguishing this case from precedents invalidating detention for delayed transmission. Given ongoing complex economic investigations, the evidentiary burden under s.24 and the petitioner's alleged suppression of facts, propensity to influence witnesses and risk of tampering, the twin conditions in s.45 were not satisfied and bail was denied.
The HC refused bail to the petitioner, upholding the validity of the arrest under the PMLA. The court found the arresting officer had recorded grounds of arrest and reasons to believe based on material collected, and judicial review could not probe sufficiency of that subjective satisfaction. Although compliance with s.19(2) was delayed, immediate delivery of the grounds to the petitioner enabled the court to verify that material pre-existed the arrest, distinguishing this case from precedents invalidating detention for delayed transmission. Given ongoing complex economic investigations, the evidentiary burden under s.24 and the petitioner's alleged suppression of facts, propensity to influence witnesses and risk of tampering, the twin conditions in s.45 were not satisfied and bail was denied.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
