Charitable trust income application permits verified capital expenditure but rejects deferred pre-operative claims and requires reconsideration of con...
Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
The HC set aside the impugned order dated 22-01-2025 concerning allegations of facilitating evasion of GST by partner hotels, concluding that the matter requires further adjudication after affording procedural fairness. The court found that Respondent No.1 must grant the Petitioner an opportunity of hearing based on all supplementary documents the Petitioner furnished, and remitted the matter for reconsideration consistent with principles of natural justice and statutory scheme under GST law. In consequence, the writ petition is disposed of without adjudication on merits, leaving open Respondent No.1's regulatory and adjudicatory pathway to determine contravention of GST provisions after hearing the Petitioner.
The HC set aside the impugned order dated 22-01-2025 concerning allegations of facilitating evasion of GST by partner hotels, concluding that the matter requires further adjudication after affording procedural fairness. The court found that Respondent No.1 must grant the Petitioner an opportunity of hearing based on all supplementary documents the Petitioner furnished, and remitted the matter for reconsideration consistent with principles of natural justice and statutory scheme under GST law. In consequence, the writ petition is disposed of without adjudication on merits, leaving open Respondent No.1's regulatory and adjudicatory pathway to determine contravention of GST provisions after hearing the Petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.