Refund claim dismissed as time-barred under s.142(5); non-obstante clause read restrictively, merits not decided, self-assessment payments not mere de...
Assessee's project-completion revenue recognition upheld; income addition deleted under Guidance Note/AS-9 and percentage-completion rules as complian...
The HC dismissed the petition seeking expedited disposal of a refund application, holding that the petitioner possessed an alternative statutory remedy before the appellate authority under s.107 of the CGST/WBGST Act, 2017. The Court found no jurisdictional error in the authority's decision to process and dispose of the refund application and declined to entertain collateral challenge by way of the present application. Although acknowledging its power in exceptional cases to set aside interlocutory orders during writ proceedings, the HC concluded this was not such a case and refused interference with the impugned disposal. Petition accordingly disposed of.
The HC dismissed the petition seeking expedited disposal of a refund application, holding that the petitioner possessed an alternative statutory remedy before the appellate authority under s.107 of the CGST/WBGST Act, 2017. The Court found no jurisdictional error in the authority's decision to process and dispose of the refund application and declined to entertain collateral challenge by way of the present application. Although acknowledging its power in exceptional cases to set aside interlocutory orders during writ proceedings, the HC concluded this was not such a case and refused interference with the impugned disposal. Petition accordingly disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
