Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT affirms the CIT(A)'s deletions and dismisses the Revenue's appeals. The Tribunal holds that for deduction computation under s.80IA(8) the market value of captive power consumed is the rate at which the assessee purchases electricity from the distribution company, and transfer pricing provisions do not override s.80IA(8) where no international transaction or real income element exists; the Explanation inserted in 2012 does not alter this position. Separately, the Tribunal upholds deletion of a s.40(a)(ia) disallowance for commissions paid to non-resident agents, concluding the services were rendered outside India, no income accrued in India, s.195 was not attracted and procedural compliance under s.195(6) was met.
The ITAT affirms the CIT(A)'s deletions and dismisses the Revenue's appeals. The Tribunal holds that for deduction computation under s.80IA(8) the market value of captive power consumed is the rate at which the assessee purchases electricity from the distribution company, and transfer pricing provisions do not override s.80IA(8) where no international transaction or real income element exists; the Explanation inserted in 2012 does not alter this position. Separately, the Tribunal upholds deletion of a s.40(a)(ia) disallowance for commissions paid to non-resident agents, concluding the services were rendered outside India, no income accrued in India, s.195 was not attracted and procedural compliance under s.195(6) was met.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.