Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CESTAT allowed the appeal by the Appellant and set aside the impugned order. The Tribunal held that where the statute prescribes payment and rate of interest on deposits, courts must grant interest strictly in terms of the statute; in the present matter the statutory scheme governed interest on deposits under Sections 35F/35FF and Section 11BB. The adjudicating authority correctly applied departmental clarification treating amounts paid during investigation as pre-deposit only to the extent prescribed, deemed the filing date as deposit-date for that portion, and awarded interest accordingly; no infirmity was found in awarding interest on the residual amount under Section 11BB. The Revenue's appeal succeeds.
CESTAT allowed the appeal by the Appellant and set aside the impugned order. The Tribunal held that where the statute prescribes payment and rate of interest on deposits, courts must grant interest strictly in terms of the statute; in the present matter the statutory scheme governed interest on deposits under Sections 35F/35FF and Section 11BB. The adjudicating authority correctly applied departmental clarification treating amounts paid during investigation as pre-deposit only to the extent prescribed, deemed the filing date as deposit-date for that portion, and awarded interest accordingly; no infirmity was found in awarding interest on the residual amount under Section 11BB. The Revenue's appeal succeeds.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
