Refund claim dismissed as time-barred under s.142(5); non-obstante clause read restrictively, merits not decided, self-assessment payments not mere de...
Assessee's project-completion revenue recognition upheld; income addition deleted under Guidance Note/AS-9 and percentage-completion rules as complian...
The HC allowed the petition and quashed the impugned seizure and penalty order issued under s.129(3) of the GST Act. The court found that the e-way bill was generated prior to detention and was produced with the reply to the show cause notice before the seizure order was passed, negating any inference of intent to evade tax. In light of the timely documentary production and absence of mens rea, the impugned orders were unsustainable in law. Consequentially, all penal and seizure measures pursuant to the detention were set aside and the petition was allowed.
The HC allowed the petition and quashed the impugned seizure and penalty order issued under s.129(3) of the GST Act. The court found that the e-way bill was generated prior to detention and was produced with the reply to the show cause notice before the seizure order was passed, negating any inference of intent to evade tax. In light of the timely documentary production and absence of mens rea, the impugned orders were unsustainable in law. Consequentially, all penal and seizure measures pursuant to the detention were set aside and the petition was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
