Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
The HC quashed the impugned assessment order framed by the first respondent under Section 147 read with Section 144C(3) and the order passed by the third respondent (Dispute Resolution Panel) and remitted the matters to the respondents for fresh adjudication. The court found a gross violation of principles of natural justice in the issuance and finalization of proceedings under Section 148A(d) and Section 144A(d), noting the petitioner's active cooperation, including timely responses and an objection under Section 144C(2) filed before the DRP with a copy emailed to the assessing office as required. The respondents are directed to reconsider and pass fresh orders consistent with law.
The HC quashed the impugned assessment order framed by the first respondent under Section 147 read with Section 144C(3) and the order passed by the third respondent (Dispute Resolution Panel) and remitted the matters to the respondents for fresh adjudication. The court found a gross violation of principles of natural justice in the issuance and finalization of proceedings under Section 148A(d) and Section 144A(d), noting the petitioner's active cooperation, including timely responses and an objection under Section 144C(2) filed before the DRP with a copy emailed to the assessing office as required. The respondents are directed to reconsider and pass fresh orders consistent with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.